Support Guerrilla Democracy News
If the sexual conduct of anyone else, in any other organization in the UK, were on the same level of severity as Sussex police; they’d be on the Sex Registration List by now.
Its an acknowledged trend within Sussex police force, for police officers to quit before their hearings in order to escape misconduct charges.
Is that why their ex Chief Constable, Martin Richards retired early?
Sussex police are wide open to extortion by organised crime. No wonder the world famous crime writer Peter James, claims Brighton is the city of choice for crime lords to settle and raise their families.
Is it really too far a stretch of the imagination for a police officer’s private sexual perversion to be discovered by a criminal, and for that criminal to blackmail that officer; threatening him or her with exposure if they didn’t do exactly what they tell them to do?
From the list below; their choice of sexually perverted police officers is pretty extensive.
Chief Inspector Rob Leet and Sergeant Sarah Porter met for sexual liaisons while on duty, and have rightly been found guilty of gross misconduct and dismissed from the force.
They were found to have conducted a relationship while at work and misused the Sussex Police system to arrange their meetings.
This reminds me of Inspector Lee Lyons who rang 11 prostitutes in just one hour while on duty. Clearly Lyons was the force’s pimp, arranging prostitutes for his colleagues.
With moral at an all-time low level, isn’t it any wonder their police officers turned to sex to raise their spirits!
The pair exchanged more than 700 messages, including hidden text of a “graphic sexual nature” in emails and acronyms, and tried to hide the trysts from their colleague, the hearing was told.
Maintaining a trend in Sussex Police to retire early to escape misconduct charges, Leet quit the force last month, before he could face the allegations at a police misconduct hearing.
Throwing a 40-year-career between them down the drain, Both Leet and Porter denied having sex on duty between August 2015 and February 2017.
Leet (22 years in the police) is a married father-of-four and Porter (18 years in the police) has a daughter with her ex-husband, also a police officer.
Lying to cover up their tracks, Porter admitted kissing Leet but said it did not amount to sexual activity, while the disciplinary panel in Lewes, East Sussex, found the allegation was proved at the hearing, and amounted to gross misconduct.
Porter was present at the hearing, while Leet was absent.
Chairwoman Victoria Goodfellow said: “The public would be appalled to learn two police officers were found in sexual activity at a time when they were supposed to be protecting them and upholding the law.”
Announcing the dismissal, Ms Goodfellow told Porter: “Your actions are likely to have caused harm to the reputation of Sussex Police and the policing profession.
“Your actions were for sexual gratification. You used your operational independence to further your relationship with Chief Inspector Leet and concealed your relationship, although we accept you were led in this by Chief Inspector Leet.”
Porter was found to have failed to attend a fatal crash on 3 July 2017, when she was un-contactable for 10 minutes.
Leet was also found to have taken advantage of a domestic abuse victim, who was “potentially vulnerable” by having sex with her.
Someone is out to blackmail their current Chief Constable Giles York, but all mention of it has been erased from the internet.
Leet denied the accusations that he had developed an inappropriate relationship with a victim of crime while on duty, and denied the relationship with Porter.
At the hearing it was said Leet had an inappropriate relationship with the woman, referred to as Miss A, between November 2014 and January 2016, after meeting at a domestic abuse action group he chaired as a district commander.
Amy Clarke, representing Sussex Police, said what began as a friendship developed into a “sexual relationship which went on for some time”.
The pair met up while he was on duty, including at Miss A’s home, and exchanged messages of an “explicit sexual nature”, the panel was told.
Ms Clarke said: “Miss A is firmly of the belief that she was, in effect, taken advantage of by Mr Leet.
“There is also a clear gulf in power there. It should have been abundantly clear to Mr Leet that there was a potential vulnerability there that should not have been exploited.”
Ms Clarke said both Leet and Porter should be dismissed.
Porter returned to work in December 2017. Her lawyer Stephen Chippeck said she had faced an “agonising” wait for proceedings, as the allegations were made two-and-a-half years ago.
A letter from Chief Inspector Andy Gooch about Porter said: “I have found Police Sergeant Porter to be respectful and courteous throughout my own dealings with her.
“I have confidence in her ability and in her current performance.”
Mr Chippeck said Porter’s work involves “horrendous” duties in the road traffic unit.
The hearing was told she once received a certificate of congratulations and a humanitarian award for “putting herself in harm’s way” to rescue a man from the River Ouse, saving his life.
Mr Chippeck asked the panel to deal with her case in a “proportionate way” adding: “Allow her to continue to do the job she both loves and is good at.”
Maverick politician, and controversial writer Matt Taylor, who is banned from holding any elected role in Sussex, is calling on his colleagues in the Truth Movement to make sure they are properly protected, and calling on police forces across the nation to properly investigate stalking and harassment, as well as helping victims get the support and protection they need.
Mr Taylor, labelled Mr.X by the Sun newspaper, blogs about his experiences, views and opinions, across a number of blog platforms, including Youtube, blogspot, Facebook and WordPress.
He first became aware of the satanic Hoaxtead Research community, after becoming interested with a satanic ritual abuse scandal, in which two children claimed their famous father was a satanic cult leader.
Mr Taylor, who lives in Brighton, soon found himself being bombarded with malicious communications.
But Mr Taylor said these comments, articles and videos soon became personal, rather than focused on his role in the public eye.
Among evidence collected by Mr Taylor and submitted to Surrey police for investigation, allegations made against Mr Taylor included that he is a paedophile and is involved in a £50 billion financial fraud.
Mr Taylor said: “Hoaxtead Research are obsessed with me. Fixated, obsessed, vindictive and criminal.”
“It became very obsessive and quite intense. For years I sort of ignored it.
“I put myself forward for election as a independent candidate in the 2015 Brighton Kemptown General Election and in the public eye. You do get a lot of attention, much of it is quite negative.
“But it started to get quite personal, they started to focus on people around me, people in my family and children, making allegations that were quite upsetting.”
He said the wake-up call was when they stepped out from behind the keyboard and into the physical world.
In October 2018, he was set to attend an important Court case at the Royal Court’s of Justice in London. Without his knowing, person(s) unknown visited his home in Brighton and gained unlawful entry into his house.
In November that year a supporter of Hoaxtead Research arrived at his home, telling neighbours he was there as an observer on behalf of the Hoaxtead Research community to film his house.
The video, never posted online included a close-up of his office, filmed through a gap in his curtains, with the online comment:
“Tidy outside your office at Bolney Road ya tramp.”
Mr Taylor said: “That really for me hit home that I’m not safe, and that I’m a victim of a serious and insidious crime.”
The allegations were referred to neighbouring force Surrey, because the last time Mr. Taylor rang Sussex police for emergency assistance, following an attack on his election office on the 15th January 2015; he was arrested for affray, while his attackers laughed and joked with the Sussex police officers.
Mr Taylor said: “The criminal route was fruitless because the Hoaxtead Research community appear to hold some kind of influence over the police. Sussex police have let me down on too many occasions and I no longer have any trust in them to investigate crimes which are being committed against me on a daily basis. Even if there was enough evidence to prosecute, they wouldn’t prosecute.”
“I had five years of evidence of police corruption, despite all that it wasn’t enough. It just shows Sussex police don’t understand the severity.”
“Unfortunately the civil route is closed to me, because I haven’t got access to between £20-40,000 to pay for legal representation.”
Keen to keep the infamous Hampstead satanic ritual abuse scandal in the public’s mind, Mr Taylor said he regrets not going to the police sooner.
He said: “I am at the end of my tether, I’ve had enough and just want it to stop.”
In today’s Hoaxtead Research blog alone, the following malicious communications appear:
Christopher D Spivey has a problem, and we’d like to help him fix it.
Spi seems to have developed a leeeeetle tiny obsession with Mr.X—not only has he prevented posted videos and blog posts about him to be displayed on this comments page, but he has also kept unusually quiet in the face of public commendation by Mr.X.
The problem, though, is that poor Spi is shy. So shy, in fact, that he has blocked Mr.X on all his accounts including his million subscribed YouTube channel.
His other problem is that he seems not to have adapted well to the rigours of post-primary school life.
So rather than come out and just admit that he cannot stop obsessing about Mr.X, he gets her
friends alliesexpedient acquaintances to write and publish nasty things about him—because everybody in Year 3 knows that this is the correct procedure for informing someone that you like them.
Yesterday, Mr.X decided to offer Spi a helping hand: he published the following Facebook updates, in hopes that it might encourage Spi to get over his shyness and face up to his feelings:
He even made up a nice invitation card for the occasion:
Some readers of this blog have even offered their assistance: Flo Destroyer kindly said that he would host the discussion on a live-stream:
But 24 hours later, and nary a word from Spi.
So Mr.X would like to issue the invitation once more: he will be happy to have a discussion with Spi, in which he invites Mr.X to ask all the questions he wants, and he will do his very best to answer.
Does Mr.X want to know about his education, his degrees, his books, his careers, how he got involved in the Hampstead SRA hoax, what size shoes he wears, why he is bald? This is his big chance to get it all out in the open, like grown-ups.
To arrange the live-stream, Spi can contact Mr.X via the Contact Us link on this blog, or via YouTube, whichever she prefers.
Come on, Spi. You know you want to.
I don’t know about everyone else, but when I hear that a Satanic website like Hoaxtead Research was set up to supposedly protect the identities of children who were wrongly exposed to the world after giving harrowing reports of abuse they had allegedly suffered at the hands of their father and his friends – many of whom operate behind that same Satanic website – and that those friends are attacking everyone they can for discussing such stories or mentioning the father’s widely publicized name, I tend to become a little suspicious.
My suspicions are further aroused, when several websites and Youtube channels pop-up sympathetically around the same time, in a vain attempt to suppress any discussion of Satanic Ritual Abuse occurring anywhere, but more specifically within the upper echelons of society.
So, I hope people can appreciate that I find it almost unfathomable, when members of the undoubtedly criminal and Satanic cult are still to be seen, running around the internet claiming the whole case was a custody battle gone wrong while at the same time, they completely ignore the fact that the father – he being Voldemort, goes and exposes those children to the world by way of having them up before the cameras after they apparently won an award for their venture into e-bay’s world of commerce.
There they are, spitting feathers and gnashing teeth like the vituperative bunch they always have been, when trying to remove all trace of videos showing the children as they appeared several years ago, and that idiot of a man goes once again and exposes them to the world as they are present-day, for his own narcissistic endeavours.
And they have the nerve to call the Mother and her Boyfriend wicked for doing it at the time?
They won’t want to acknowledge it though, will they. You know, given that what he has done constitutes serious child abuse in itself.
What has Spivey given to the Alternative Media, and if ever his website were to close, what has he achieved?
The first thing that springs to mind is confusion.
For example, whenever I hear or read anything about Madeleine McCann, all I seem to hear is a little voice in the depths of my mind, telling me that Madeleine McCann didn’t even exist.
The same goes for Princess Diana and half of the politicians in Parliament, Jo Cox, Meghan Markle and even Theresa May.
So more than anything, for me personally, all Spivey has achieved is to muddy the waters even further than what they already were.
Just when you think you are getting a proper measure of a subject, along comes Chris Spivey who says you’re a “fucking bellend” for believing it; and that if you were really clever you’ll believe his version of reality instead.
More than anything, Spivey has left me even more confused about the world in which we life, than ever before.
And then the question arises; should we even be listening to Spivey in the first place?
After-all, what with his self proclaimed insistence that he is a methodical forensic researcher of such high esteem that there is no other intellect in the world that equals his own, (except maybe the bloggers of Coleman Experience and Aangirfan); he then goes onto dismiss the testimony of the two children in the infamous Hampstead case, (who for legal reasons I shall refer to as Jack and Jill), on the grounds that they both didn’t look “too traumatized.”
You would have hoped that his analysis would have been based on something a bit more conclusive, other than Jack and Jill not looking “too traumatized.”
So according to Spivey, this proves Jack and Jill were coached by their mother and her boyfriend, to tell such a detailed story of satanic ritual abuse.
Spivey has a loyal, dedicated and fanatical fan-base. I was one such devoted fan, who was once called “my mate Matt,” by the great man himself.
Read more: My mate Matt by Chris Spivey.
But that all changed when I apologized to his arch critic, Tom Cahill, and of-course, when I failed to turn up and support him at his harassment trial.
“And lets face it Matt, you have made some awful errors of judgement of late… Like apologising to that drug addicted paid troll in the jungle for one…”
“However, now you have brought the subject up, I don’t remember seeing you at my court case last month…”
The above sentence is taken from a longer sentence that appears to apportion me a level of blame in the court’s decision to find him guilty of harassment.
I personally think it’s very healthy to have healthy opposition. Constructive criticism is vital to personal development and I welcomed the emergence of Tom Cahill as the leading nemesis of the Alternative Media’s leading figures.
Relations between myself and Spivey hit rock bottom, after I asked him his opinion about the Hampstead kids, to which he replied he would only give me his opinion, if I paid him £500 for a paragraph response and £50 for a one word response.
It hurt because I like to think I’ve done more than most, to promote Spivey across the world, and having published positive articles about him on UK Blasting News and have donated money and brought his books, to be treated with such contempt did feel like a dagger in the heart.
I’ll be honest with you. When I heard his website was closing, my first response was, ‘good riddance.’
I mean really, what has Spivey done for anyone else? He sits on his throne looking down upon the Alternative Media, and under his own admission, is happy to watch it take “an almighty fall,” hoodwinked, by what he believes is a psy-op, with the Hampstead case.
I really can’t get my head around that, especially considering I and Sabine McNeill, (whose been jailed for 9 years), were keen to know what his thoughts were about he Hampstead case?
Perhaps if he warned the Alternative Media that he thought the Hampstead Case was a psy-op by the Monster Elite, to discredit the movement, then perhaps, just perhaps, Sabine McNeill may have acted differently, and perhaps, just maybe, be a free woman today, rather than languishing in jail for the longterm future.
For someone who is so quick to call other people cunts, he certainly doesn’t like being called one himself.
And of-course if anyone does call him a cunt, his fanatical fan-base are quick to come to his defense.
According to the mainstream media, Spivey will be forever remembered in history as the world’s worse troll. Though of-course, one’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter, and that’s no different with Spivey.
But what has he done for his fan-base, except confuse us all the more than we’ve ever been before.
It’s all very well publishing million worded articles, which the average reader struggles to finish, with hundreds of face comparison pictures, but where is the solid proof?
It seems a lot of the proof, is having faith in Spivey that he knows best. But how can we have confidence in Spivey, when he dismisses the testimony of Jack and Jill, based on his assessment that they don’t look “too traumatized?”
Take for example my own investigation into the recent Christchurch mass slaughter shootings in New Zealand.
I’ve gone further than any researcher in the world, by unmasking the satanic super soldier, who killed seven people at the Linwood Mosque, to be Elliot Dawson.
In the same vein as Spivey publishes his evidence, I’ve published indisputable evidence that Elliot Dawson was present at the Linwood mosque on the day of the shooting, and indisputable evidence, that Elliot Dawson is a mentally retarded satanic super soldier, who processes just enough intelligence to follow his orders, without question, emotion and hesitation.
Anyone who doesn’t believe me, and anyone who questions my research and findings, are absolute bellends, with zero intelligence, who need their fucking minds examined.
So, in the same vein as Spivey, I’ve presented my evidence as indisputable, and have bullied anyone who dares to question it.
At the end of the day, Spivey enjoys a very privileged position of being a well known figure in the Alternative Media; but what has he achieved by being in this position?
The answer is absolutely nothing! Under his own admission, all he’s achieved is a “horrific financial nightmare.”
That stinks of bad management. He’s evidently been listening to bad advice; and in turn, passes on that bad advice to his fan-base.
It’s as if Spivey is that fabled Ethiopian who is constantly given money to buy food, but never learns to grow his own.
Yes, of-course I’m bitter and prejudiced against Spivey. He’s done fuck all for me, while berating me for doing fuck all for him.
As if it wasn’t bad enough being trolled by the satanic readership of the Hoaxtead Research community, I’ve been equally harassed and trolled by Spivey’s readership.
I can’t leave a comment without some arse hole, like Barney leaving a malicious response.
Spivey’s administration team, Wolfman and Dogman, know full well who is posting and their IP addresses, and are more than happy to allow comments accusing me of posting comments, I never wrote, to stay up for everyone to see.
I hate to say it, but Spivey has either intentionally or unintentionally, confused the fuck out of the Alternative Media, and that’s his legacy.
Instead of clarifying the situation, he’s muddied it further. Instead of explaining the unexplained, he’s sown so much confusion, that now the world according to Spivey, is simply unbelievable.
Well done Spivey, you have ensured the Alternative Media will never ever, gain the credibility it so desperately needs, to break into the mainstream.
Leaving the last word to Abe: