Chris Spivey Breaks his Silence on the Hampstead SRA Case

Better late than never; writer Chris Spivey has finally come of the fence and publicly declared his view on the infamous Hampstead SRA case, currently being kept alive and kicking by the Hoaxtead Research satanic community.

Sabine McNeill & The Hampstead Hoax

Read more:

Why did it take Chris Spivey nearly 5 years to comment on the Hampstead case is a mystery. I remember asking him on back in 2015 for his thoughts on the subject.

A simply yes or no answer will suffice- do you believe them or not

To which Chris Spivey bizarrely replied; demanding money for an answer.

Subject: RE: Hampstead
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:08:07

Hello Matthew,

I trust you are well and that you have your financial and accommodation problems sorted out now.
Matthew, this is your second email to me in less than 24 hours, the first of which you began:
“I’m sorry I’ve been a pain but I just need to know what you think about the Hampstead case”.
You then go on to demand a yes or no answer to whether I believe the “Hampstead kids”.
Yet when I don’t jump to attention and get back to you straight away you revert to being a pain in the arse and send a follow up email, again demanding a yes or no answer as to my position on the “Hampstead kids”.
Therefore you lied to me because you are not sorry for being a pain in the arse.
Moreover, whilst being a pain in the arse you quote me as saying in a “recent article”: if anyone disbelieves the Hampstead kids they must either be – A troll. A fool. Reluctant to step out of their comfort zone.
Yet I have never ever written any such thing Matthew!

I also feel that I should point out to you that in your capacity as the “daddy of the Alternative Media” mine and anyone elses position on any given story should not matter a jot to you. Indeed, as the “daddy” you surely lead and fuck what anyone else thinks about anything… You do however need to work on your hardman act because you actually come across as a bit gay.

Nevertheless, for all you know Matthew I might have written an article on the “Hampstead kids” since you no longer have any interest in what I write – In fact I believe that your exact words were::

Well, that’s made my mind up for sure! That’s the last Spivey article I’m going to read. What a fucking waste of time that was”.
And surely you are a man of your word Matthew?
However, just to recap:
  • Whilst pursuing a course of conduct tantamount to harassment
  • You demonstrate your lack of integrity by lying to me
  • whilst being a right pain in the arse
  • and accusing me of writing statements that I haven’t
  • yet feel you have the right to demand a personal audience with me
  • as befits your superior standing in the Alternative Media, despite coming across as a bit of a gay clown
  • who no longer has any interest in what I have to say on anything
And with that being the case, I feel a more business like approach is needed.
Therefore my terms are as follows:
A straight yes or no answer………………………………………………………………… £100
A detailed summary……………………………………………………………………………… £500
Terms are non-negotiable, Payment is in advance.
Don’t thank me.

Talk about being Bitter!

Its with this in mind; I want to have a look again at exactly Chris Spivey has to say about the Hampstead case. So without further ado, let’s jump straight in.

“There are reasons that I have not written about the Hampstead Satanic Child Abuse case up until now.

The main reason that I didn’t write about the case back in 2014, which centered around the online testimony of two children – who made all manner of lurid claims – was because there was no evidence to back up what they were saying.”

“no evidence to back up what they were saying”

Surely the very testimony of saying something happened, is evidence of something have happened?

When I was in the Royal Military Police, we took witness statement’s, which were used in Court Martial’s as evidence.

“In other words, their claims could not be proved or disproved either way. However, I must also add that the two children did not appear to me to be too traumatised by the awful events which they claimed to have witnessed and as such I decided to err on the side of caution and leave the reporting – or lack of it– to others.”

So according to Spivey just because the two children didn’t look “too traumatised by the awful events which they claimed to have witnessed,” he in all his superior wisdom, “decided to err on the side of caution and leave the reporting – or lack of it- to others.”

Though when “others” do report on the case, and ask for his opinion, as a leading writer in the Alternative Media, Spivey replies demanding:

A straight yes or no answer………………………………………………………………… £100
A detailed summary……………………………………………………………………………… £500
Terms are non-negotiable, Payment is in advance.
If applying the same principle of thinking, that just because a victim doesn’t look “too traumatised,” then they must be lying; wouldn’t that debunk his own theory on the Princess Diana fake myth he promotes?
Both William and Harry didn’t look too traumatised after their mother’s death, so of-course, their mother never really died.
Andy Hill didn’t look too traumatised following his miraculous survival of the Shoreham crash; which means he must be lying too.
Of-course all the Windsor children don’t look too traumatised having being brought up by the satanic equivalent of the Adam’s Family, as Spivey is so keen to remind us, so of-course they must be lying too.
Here we have two kids, who claim to have been brought up conducting satanic ritual abuse with their father. Any children faced with this scenario wouldn’t be traumatised. Chopping babies heads off with help from Daddy would become the norm. They wouldn’t be traumatised by actions which the group don’t feel traumatised while doing it.
I really would have expected more from such a highly intellectual researcher, as Spivey so often likes to remind us. A researcher of such high intellect and wisdom, that’s he’s able to spot a false flag event a mile off, seems to fall so utterly short, when it comes to the Hampstead case

And by “lack of reporting” I do not mean that nobody picked up on the story. On the contrary almost everybody with an ‘alternative media’ blog seized upon the sordid tale without apparently thinking things through… Yet – as I just stated – there was nothing to report except the testimony of those two children who did not seem too traumatised for their alleged horrific experience.

Yes indeed; almost everyone in the ‘Alternative Media’ seized upon the story, except Spivey; of whom it took a whooping 5 years to comment on.

I wasn’t the only person asking for his opinion on the subject. Sabine McNeill was asking him too! All to no avail… 

did you get anywhere with crhis asks sabine

So according to Spivey, “there was nothing to report except the testimony of those two children who did not seem too traumatised for their alleged horrific experience.”

WOW; REALLY WOW! Evidently hours and hours of detailed recollection of satanic ritual abuse isn’t deemed ‘evidential’ enough to be taken seriously by Spivey.

But yet he expects us to believe his contentions that:

  • Madeleine McCann didn’t exist and is a fictional construct
  • The Windsor Royal family are all satanic monsters
  • Princess Diana didn’t exist and is a fictional construct
  • There are only a half of the MP’s which Parliament claims there to be, and that the real half, are doubling up to represent the other fictional half
  • The Shoreham crash was a false flag event
  • and on
  • and on
  • and on

But using Spivey’s own principles of deduction; none of these theories can be right, because none of them looked “too traumatised.”

Fuck me; I’d love to see what Spivey’s “traumatised” looks like!

Moreover, the more that the story evolved, the more that I began to suspect that a psy-op was taking place and the alternative media was being set up for an almighty fall… Just like Lord McAlpine did with Steve Messham back in 2012.

Ha ha, he reminds me of a Thailand based billionaire, who sees fraud before his very eyes, but does absolutely nothing about it.

So here we have Spivey suspecting the whole Hampstead Case to be a psy-op, taking place against the ‘Alternative Media,’ being set up for “an almighty fall,” and yet Spivey, just like the Thailand billionaire, choose to do nothing about it.

WOW; what does that say about Spivey?

“I’m alright Jack! I can see the cliff-edge, but I’m not going to tell anyone else they are heading for a fall; I’ll just hang back and watch all the lemmings jump to their deaths.”

It tells us that the ‘Alternative Media’ means nothing to him. The very group of people who pays his vet bills, his internet bills and his living bills, mean so little to him, he is happy to keep quiet while all his readers get sucked in by the biggest psy-op in recent history.

What an arse -hole! REALLY!

And it now seems that I was right in my belief since Sabine McNeill has been sentenced to NINE years in prison for the part that she played in perpetuating the hoax.

“The part she played in perpetuating the hoax.”

Oh there you go; he was right all along. He was right all along because Sabine McNeill was sentenced to NINE years in prison for the part that she played in perpetuating the hoax.

A hoax which as far back as 2015, Spivey claims to have known was a psy-op by the government, to set up “an almight fall” for the fledgding Truth Movement.

So can’t it be argued that Spivey played a part in Sabine’s 9 year sentence, simply by keeping quiet and not saying a word?

How many people would have looked at the Hampstead case differently, if the almighty Spivey was to come out publicly, saying he thought the Hampstead case was a psy-op by the Establishment, to set up the ‘Alternative Media’ for an “Almighty Fall?”


Just like that Thailand billionaire who did fuck-all when he knew his name was being used in a financial fraud; Spivey chose to do fuck all, and thus, allowed a hoax to be “perpetuated” throughout the Truth Movement, knowing full well that it was a major psy-op designed to discredit the movement.

That means Spivey knew what was going down, but chose to do nothing and so, betraying the very community which put him on the pedestal from which he now looks down upon his sheeple.

I mean, c’mon! Get real. People do not receive 9 years prison for manslaughter let alone harassment and breaching a restraining order. Yet by giving a 74 year old pensioner such a severe sentence for making outlandish claims sends out a clear message to anyone else thinking about doing so.

Yeah thanks for the warning Spivey!

Indeed, the very fact that the national press, who all quietly reported – if that is what you can call it – on McNeill’s case are not up in arms about the severity of the sentence is all the proof that I need to indicate that this was psy-op.

Well done Spivey! What else are you keeping to yourself?

My suspicions are further raised by the fact that the mother and step-father who the police claim forced their two children to invent their accounts have been on the run since February 2015 – Four years without capture.

OH wow; you skills at deduction are truly Sherlock Holmes like!

Indeed, they must have read the Osama Bin Laden book on ‘Hide and Seek for professionals‘ to evade capture for so long… Either that or the police are not looking for them too hard.

Yes indeed; whatever you say Spivey! You are so wise and intelligent, whatever you say must the the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the distorted truth.

After all, it is nigh on impossible to just disappear these days unless you are a member of the mafia or something.

Nigh on impossible!

Moreover, you have to ask yourself how Sabine got all of the details about the Satanic abuse. The following is taken from the Chimp:

Well we know don’t we? She got all the details about the satanic abuse from the hours and hours of testimony from the kids.

She published details of the cult online saying: ‘They would drink the blood of babies and then dance around wearing the skulls on parts of their bodies.

‘They would put them to sleep by injecting them, slit their throats, cook the babies and eat them.’

McNeill even claimed babies were cooked in a secret room in a McDonald’s restaurant on Finchley Road.  

Technically it was the kids, Jack and Jill, who made these claims, and Sabine McNeill simply repeated them. Come on Spivey, get your facts right.

‘The allegations were of murder, cannibalism, satanism and sexual abuse. They could not be more serious or vile. Source

But hey, regardless of how serious or vile the allegations, if the victims don’t look “too tarumatised,” then it’s best to err on the side of caution, and dismiss everything they say as a hoax.

McNeill also claims that those taking part in the Satanic abuse included: Teachers, Social Workers, The Police and Members of the Clergy, yet it is not stated how she came upon all of that information.

Again, it was the kids who claimed this, not Sabine.

I can however tell you that no one in the know tells you nothing in this game unless you are working for the security services.

Yet Spivey evidently seems to be working for the security services, because he was in the know, and decided to say nothing to no one.

So am I saying that Sabine was in on the fraud? No. I am not saying that she was or that she wasn’t because I really do not know. I mean she could have been or she could just as easily have been set up and used.

“I really do not know.”Arh at last some truth from Spivey. He really did not know. That was the real reason he said nothing,  now wasn’t it.

“I mean she could have been or she could just as easily have been set up and used.”

Fuck me, the man’s deduction skills leave Sherlock Holmes running for cover. The very fact that he let the ‘Alternative Media’ be led down the merry path, shows he knew they were being set up and chose to do nothing about it.

Why the fuck is Spivey in the ‘Alternative Media’ when he doesn’t give a fuck whether it takes an “almighty fall?”

Nevertheless, nine years for the alleged crimes committed by McNeill is the kind of term usually condemned by the press as a breach of human rights for being handed out to those who dare to speak out in countries such as China, Russia and North Korea.

There you go; but you’ll never hear Spivey call it a satanic cover-up now will you!

And despite that fact, not one of our national newspapers has criticised the sentence which in the case of 74 year old Sabine is in theory akin to a life sentence.

Only the ‘Alternative Media’ have criticized the sentence, but Spivey wouldn’t know anything about the ‘Alternative Media,’ because we now know he’s on the outside looking in.

Indeed, the fact that the Chimp has moderated the comments on its farticle says it all really… There are four at the time of writing whereas such an article would normally generate thousands.

Nothing you say makes sense Spivey.

Not that the 9 year sentence makes any sense.

You see, McNeill was convicted of four counts of harassment and six counts of breaching a restraining order.

The Chimp then goes on to say that “McNeill was jailed for a total of nine years”… However, quite crucially – not to mention predictably – the Monkey-Kuntz do not say whether those 9 years are made up of concurrent sentences.

Let me explain…

Oh now you want to explain? Well maybe if you explained back in 2015, Sabine McNeill may not now be serving a 9 year sentence, for perpetrating a story, which apparently Spivey knew was a hoax all along.

When I was disgustingly convicted of two counts of harassment and two counts of sending malicious communications – although to this day I still do not know how that was possible – I was sentenced to 6 months in prison suspended for two years on each count.

“When I was disgustingly convicted….” Oh please!

That means that had the sentences not been suspended I would in the eyes of the law have been sentenced to two years in prison, but because the four 6 months terms were concurrent, I would only have served 6 months maximum – three months with good behaviour.

And if McNeill’s sentences are concurrent – and they usually are – she could logically be out in six months since she was convicted on 10 counts and each count has to be sentenced separately.

Therefore, she may well have received for example; a years prison for each count of breaking the restraining order and 9 months for each count of harassment all to run concurrently – making 9 years in total (and the Chimp does say that “McNeill was jailed for a total of nine years”) , but 1 year in reality and out in 6 months with good behaviour.

Indeed, that would make much more sense since the maximum sentence for breaking a restraining order is FIVE years and the average sentence for harassment if you are unlucky is six months suspended for a year.

In fact for McNeill to be sentenced to prison for ‘Harassment Without Violence‘ in the first place – even if they are concurrent sentences – is an outrage.

And as for breaking the restraining order six times remember, this is the first time that she has been in court for doing so. In other words, it is not as if she was in court for the sixth time for breaking that restraining order.


Indeed, Matthew Taylor was recently up in court for breaching a restraining order on four counts (if I remember rightly) and was given 4 months prison suspended for two years.


Course, the judge described the harassment that McNeill was convicted of as being “high end“, but they always say that (my harassment conviction was described in court as high end but I didn’t go to prison) and the fact remains that it was harassment WITHOUT violence and as far as I can see that consisted of McNeill making the accusations on a blog, attending a protest outside a church, handing out leaflets and urging her readers to send Barbie Dolls painted red to those that she had accused… How many Barbie Dolls were sent is unknown (very few I doubt) but when you consider that an LBC Radio Deejay told his listeners to throw bricks at me, for which he was reprimanded by OFCOM instead of being charged with inciting violence, it is hard to fathom how McNeill’s harassment was at the high end.

Neither should you take any notice of the impact on the victims as described in the farticles. Indeed, the victims are encouraged by the police to make their impact statements as damningly devastating as possible… Especially in cases such as this.

However, as I say, by stating that McNeill has been sent to prison for 9 years will do the trick and is quite possibly the final nail in the coffin of the alternative media – which is in all honesty on its last legs anyway… And that was the whole point of this exercise in the first place.

And now we’ll always remember that Chris Spivey did nothing about it. Spivey simply sat back, kept silent and watched the very movement which put dog food in the bowls of his dogs, food on his plate and the plates of his daughter and grand-child; to take an almighty fall to their deaths.

Fuck you Spivey; you really are a tool.

Just sayin’.

I’m still the fucking Daddy.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

11 thoughts on “Chris Spivey Breaks his Silence on the Hampstead SRA Case

  1. Spivey had to make a deal not to go to nick after Lee Rigby ….guess where he sold his soul?

    The children are credible unlike the father a failed actor who is now seeking slime, and his childrens images for e bay

    The nonsense that they were beaten to remember such a horrific story is risible

    Their stories are backed up by the medical evidence , the police interviews and the lengths to which the state were prepared to cover it up from the BBC,who have now removed all the comments , to the evil cow of a family court judge who had to retire.

    Let us not forget that cesspit of nonces ,Karen Irving’s Hoaxtead who even now try to rubbish Don Hale who was exposing PIE

    El Coyote Retweeted

    Richard Bartholomew
    Don Hale’s claim about “the PIE office in Westminster” where “MPs helped out” shows how legends grow.

    PIE’s chairman was an electrical contractor in the Home Office whose light duties gave him time to discretely misuse the facilities provided – until he was rumbled by the NoW.

    Honestly who does that other than paedophiles?

    I see Spivey has the begging bowl out again.

    I dont know why , he should have 13 pieces of silver to keep going for a while

    Keep up the good work Mr X



    1. Mr ‘X’ demolishes attempted Hampstead Cover Up absurdities; exposes the hubris of the #pedosodomitedeathcult #HOAXTARDS; metaphorically ‘bitch slaps’ ‘Spineless #childsextrafficking apologist Spivey;’ whilst surrounding/‘binding and controlling’ this horde of abominable, anti-human, mistreants.
      Respect, Mr ‘X’ Sir.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s