Many thanks for your concern and I wish there were more people like you in society, you’ve taken an interest in the Hampstead case.
By notifying me of this judgement you have proved that Ricky Dearman and Sussex police were lying when they insisted Dearman was a ‘Protected Witness,’ who no-one was allowed to name.
You see the paper work PC Lyon threatened me with arrest on Saturday 9 February 2019 at 9 pm, was a court judgment dated 12 February 2015.
The Judgement by MRS JUSTICE PAUFFLEY, which you’ve sent me is dated 19 March 2015.
In the judgement dated 19 March 2015, (the final judgement on the matter and which makes all judgement’s void before it), it clearly states: “This judgment was delivered in public.
The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children is preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
This judgment is being given in public and without anonymisation save as to the children’s names.”
It means the children are not allowed to be named, and only the children.
Judge Pauffley mentions Ricky Dearman’s name many times:
“These are care proceedings brought by the London Borough of Barnet relating to two children, P and Q who are 9 and 8 years old respectively. Their parents are Ella Draper and Ricky Dearman.”
According to Sussex Police and Ricky Dearman, Judge Pauffley must now be arrested for naming Ricky Dearman.
This proves there is a satanic sect within Sussex Police and I demand my iMac computer and Samsung 10 phone is returned immediately.