Two Questions to Sussex Police

Sent on Friday 22/11/2019 at 07:58

Dear Sussex Police,

Please excuse me while I try and understand the events which led to my arrest for harassment on the 23 September 2019.

Is it common for Sussex police to open an investigation, into an allegation which was investigated within that year, but which found insufficient evidence to charge?

What I mean is – Ricky Dearman made a complaint against me for harassment and making a malicious video about him, in which I was arrested in October 2018, where after all my computer equipment was seized and detained for 9 months.

After the investigation no charges were brought, which in my view means I didn’t harass him and nor did I make a malicious video about him.

But yet, within a year, I’ve again been arrested for harassment following a complaint by the same person???

I simply don’t understand why Sussex police would conduct another arrest against me, when less than a year ago, Sussex police arrested me, and found I had no case to answer???

Do you understand what I’m saying?

If it was found I had no case to answer the last time I was alleged to have harassed this man, why have I been arrested again, when its likely I’ll again be found to have no case to answer?

Aren’t Sussex police wasting their own time and resources?

Yours sincerely,

Matthew Taylor

Sent on Friday 22/11/2019 at 08:19

Dear Sussex Police,

Please excuse me again for contacting you; I’m just trying to understand the events which led to my arrest on 23 September 2019 for harassment.

The arrest on 23 September 2019 was as an consequence of a charge that I broke a court judgement, which was handed to me by PC Lyons on the 9 February 2019, when while intoxicated at my home on a Saturday night with my sister, PC Lyons knocked on my door at 9 pm, waved around a court judgement by Mrs Justice Pauflley dated 10 February 2015, which forbid the naming of everyone involved in the horrific Hampstead satanic case, including the children, parents, teachers and others.

It just so happened that there was a second Mrs Justice Pauffley judgement dated 19 March 2015, which allowed the naming of the parents.

So of-course this leads to the obvious question, as to why Sussex police sent an officer round to my home, waving an out of date court judgement and insisting I adhere to it, on threat of arrest?

Do you get what I’m saying?

I don’t understand why Sussex police would do that? 

Sussex police is a professional operation, and must have known about the 19 March 2015 Mrs Justice Pauffley judgement which permitted the naming of the Hampstead parents, and must have known the 10 February 2015 judgement was null and void.

I wouldn’t bother you otherwise, but its serious because I’ve been arrested for allegedly breaking a null and void court judgement and as a result have had my computer equipment seized, depriving me of making a living as a freelance writer and journalist.

Christmas is coming and you are depriving me of earning money to buy my children their Christmas presents.

I look forward to answers to both of the questions I’ve asked today.

Many thanks,

Matthew Taylor

Null and void – 10 February 2015 Mrs Justice Pauffley judgement

Matthew Taylor

Extracts from the 19 March 2015 – Mrs Justice Pauffley judgement

#JailRickyDearman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s