In news you won’t hear on any BBC’s Ten O’Clock bulletin, a Moai King on the other side of the world, is claiming to have dethroned British Queen Elizabeth II, having sacked her as the Trustee of the Queen Victoria Fund, bequeathed to the British and Common-Wealth people by Queen Victoria’s predecessor, King William IV.
While most people will see Moai misspelt, John Wanoa 69, born in New Zealand, claims the Moairi tribes of New Zealand, (made famous with the All Black’s Haka dance at their rugby matches), are a British made-tribe, forcibly introduced into New Zealand In the late 18th Century, to force out the indigenous people.
Surrogate King William IV
Calling himself the Surrogate King William IV Monarch, John Wanoa speaks like a King, though doesn’t necessarily lives like a King, having been forced to sleep in his car, having been denied entry into Britain, deemed a threat to the Queen.
Part of an ever growing subculture called the Truth Movement, King John Wanoa, (as his followers call him,) regularly appears on Facebook and Youtube, broadcasting hour long broadcasts, explaining his plans for global domination and salvation.
“I’ve sacked the Queen.”
Claiming Queen Elizabeth II has abandoned her Kingdom, John Wanoa has issued a Writ of Control and Possession, claiming higher authority over the Queen Bench, by issuing his Writ in the higher authority of the King’s Bench.
With only 3 days left for Queen Elizabeth II to refute the claims made within his Writ, its predicted a number of his followers with adopt the 8 point star of St Patrick’s Star, giving the holder’s the authority of King’s Sheriff’s, tasked with arresting and detaining Queen Elizabeth II.
The Veterans
Having caused a split within the Truth Movement, 4.8 million veterans of the British Army, represented by the maverick Simon Bean MBE, have decided to align their allegiance with the Queen, accusing the King Bench of John Wanoa, to be a scam and treasonous.
Will John Wanoa save the world?
Leading the fastest growing sector in the Truth Movement, more and more people are joining John Wanoa’s King Bench, as a viable and distinct alternative to the politics of the day.
With disillusionment in our politician’s at an all time high, more and more people are taking an interest in a King from the other side of the world, who is promising to come to the UK and demolish the status quo.
Promising a cash injection of £970 million trillion trillion, a new tidal energy/hydrogen power economy and relying on the Laws of King William IV, John Wanoa envisages a world in which poverty, child-abuse and war, are all things of the past.
Welcome to the Andy Devine Show
Proudly promoting John Wanoa, and a number of other prominent whistle-blowers in the Truth Movement, the Andy Devine Show is becoming the focal point for John’s followers to meet, plan and discuss the on-going adventures of King John.
A new threat from the other side of the world threatens the future of the Windsor royal dynasty, as once Oliver Cromwell threatened the Stuart’s.
Surrogate King William IV Monarch, King John Wanoa
(And history vividly remembers what happened to Charles I) Mercilessly trolled by the satanic MI6 cyber wing of the Queen’s Satanic Super Soldier (SSS) army; Surrogate King William IV John Wanoa, 70 from Zealand, has been forced to sleep in his car, surviving on food stamps, because his pension has been stopped due to malicious complaints made by the MI6 sponsored trolls, and an assortment of useful idiots, and including maverick veteran Simon Bean MBE.
Banned from the UK, deemed a threat to the Queen; King John, (as he is called by his ever growing global audience,) has issued his last Writ against Queen Elizabeth II. If not refuted by the 29 June 2019, she will be sacked her as the Trustee of the Queen Victoria Trust Fund, (which in today’s money, (plus costs, damages and compensation) amounts to £970 million trillion trillion), effectively depositing her as the Monarch of the United Kingdom and the Common Wealth. Only a Monarch can depose a Monarch, and Queen Elizabeth II has until the 29 June 2019, to refute the Writ and Affidavit of King John Wanoa, of the Moai New Zealand Rogan Royal Dynasty.
Like Subscribe and share to catch all the latest news about John Wanoa, Andy Devine, David Noakes, Lyn Thyer, Neelu Berry, Edward Ellis and many more personalities from the world of the Alternative View / Truth Movement.
Fraud investigator, Royal Commission Protected Witness and an all-round Peaceful Warrior, 69 year old Sir John Paterson, was sentenced to 21 days in prison, suspended for 12 months, for being in contempt of court.
A packed public gallery heard how in April 2017, John Paterson secretly recorded a court case at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, on a small voice recorder.
Even though all court cases are recorded and available to the public, and whilst in some circumstances permission can be given to record court proceedings, Mr Paterson was subjected to 2 years of state sponsored torture, threatened with jail, and fines, for recording a public event, for his own educational and personal reasons.
In-side Court 16 of the Royal Courts of InJustice
Once Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis kicked off the proceedings, (with the latter doing all the talking), Citizen John Paterson addressed the court, stating he has Crown Protection and for his witness Equity Lawyer, Edward Ellis, to explain further.
Upon being refused Mr Paterson said, “It is my right to do so,” after which Edward Ellis said to the Judges, “You have no jurisdiction,” to which Mr Justice William Davis replied, “Having heard what I’ve just heard, Mr Ellis, go and sit in the public gallery.”
Judgement of Court
Having endured the stress and strain of having imprisonment, fine or both, hanging over his head for the last two years, a packed public gallery heard the Application by the Attorney General for the imprisonment of Mr Paterson for contempt of court.
With the verdict hanging in the balance, whispered chat throughout Court 16 was of a suspended sentence.
Who’s Mr.X?
Mentioned in the harassment case of Christoper D Spivey in 2015 (against the family of the murdered soldier Lee Rigby,) and now again in Mr Paterson’s contempt case, Mr.X was referred to by name; all further information is REDACTED.
It was explained by the Prosecution that at the time of the recording, it wasn’t noticed, but came to light later when audio of the REDACTED CASE was uploaded to Youtube.
Having hid the recording device in the base of a house plant, police initially missed it when they raided his property in relation to the REACTED CASE, on the 8th May 2017.
Mr Paterson voluntarily surrendered the listening device which was found to have 5 recordings of the REDACTED CASE.
With good support in the public gallery, loyal friend and supporter Neelu Berry entered court late; having had herself a busy night, sparing with the forces of Satan knocking at her door at a quarter to eleven, protecting ‘Cure for Cancer’ whistle-blower, Lynda Thyer.
State Sponsored Assassination Attempt
Looking relaxed, at peace and calm, Mr Paterson lent back against the Queen’s bench, as the Prosecution and Judges waffled on for 15 minutes, talking legalese between themselves.
Slowly and surely a consensus was agreed;
No one was aware of the recording
Mr Paterson had offered it for transcribing, all offers were declined
The recording was made for his own personal use
Citing more evidence against him, via his emails, proving his contempt, the Judge asked in no uncertain terms, “What excuse do you have for recording a public event?”
“I had to because I’m exposing the corrupt judiciary. I do not accept it’s a contempt of court,” Mr Paterson answered.
Going further, Mr Paterson said “The PM and Attorney General have provided protection frauds for organised crime.”
No witnesses from the Prosecution
Standing before the Judges alone and without any legal representation, the Prosecution called no witnesses, while Mr Paterson was allowed to cross examine DC Grimwood.
Mr Grimwood takes the stand
With the Prosecution asking DC Grimwood to open a number of bundles of paper, and to confirm that the Statement of 19 June 2017, was a true and accurate account of the events, and whether another statement on 24 May 2019, was also his own, the Prosecution wrapped it up and it was Mr Paterson’s turn to cross examine him.
Mr Paterson started by asking him to confirm whether he had received information about serious crimes of State and Judiciary?
Looking for guidance from Mr Justice William Davis to continue, DC Grimwood confirmed that he had.
Pressed by the Judge as to whether there were anymore questions, Mr Paterson asked why he hadn’t done anything about the serious crimes he had already reported?
“I’m guilty of trying to save my country.”
Mr Justice William Davis – “Do you accept that you did record the proceedings?”
Sir John Paterson – “Yes I did, I had to do it.”
Mr Justice William Davis – “Do you accept its contempt of court?”
Sir John Paterson – “No. I’ve had to do it, to bring the fraud to the attention of the public.”
Confirming to the court that Mr Paterson had reported serious crimes of government and judiciary to himself, and confirming that he is in possession of all the evidence Mr Paterson possessed, DC Grimwood was allowed to leave the witness stand.
10.37am The Fantastic Four arrive, and pile into the public gallery
Frank McElheron, David Ellis, Bryn Real and Tony Livingstone.
The Judges rose to reassess the situation at 10.50am
Mr Justice William Davis offers Mr Paterson a choice of taking the witness stand or to remain seated. Either to give evidence or make submissions.
(It’s all legalese to me.)
As the mis-trial continued unabated, Mr Paterson was denied legal representation, and was left with no alternative but to defend himself against the Attorney General, (who was costing the taxpayer £19K a day)
A Mistrial and an Injustice of Justice
Mr Paterson read out the introduction of a prepared statement by Edward Ellis, declaring he wanted the Equity Lawyer to explain further, but is unable to.
“Thisconduct does amount to contempt of court,” sneered the Prosecution.
With gasps from the public gallery, the Judges concluded that Mr Paterson has been proved to be in contempt, and that the respondent knew he wasn’t allowed to record but went ahead and did so anyway.
The Judge summed up in disjointed language, “Your defense of corruption has nothing to point.”
The Judges have now moved onto working out how long to sentence him.
“This is a set up, poor guy,” said a member from the public gallery.
The facts established are as follows:
He voluntarily submitted the listening device to police
He hasn’t undertaken any recording since
He’s never published anything online about the REDACTED proceedings
“Here’s hoping for a suspended sentence,” said one member in the public gallery to the other, “the Judges appear to be considerate that John has been a good boy.”
Mr Paterson’s previous Common Law lawyer and friend, Patrick Cullinane is mentioned. Mr Paterson’s voiced his fear that what happened to Patrick will happen to him.
“I don’t think he’s going down, but will be given a suspended sentence. I really hope so,” said one reporter to the other.
Whispering between themselves like sly bullies at school, conspiring to cause harm, loss and injury to the unfortunate souls they’ve chosen to pick on, both Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis moved onto discussing case studies, to determine how much time they can legally sentence him to.
Citing Mr Scarf, a 78-year-old pensioner, who received 28 days suspended for 2 years, for continually committing contempt of court, and Mr Cullinane, (Mr Paterson’s Common Law Lawyer) for his alleged crimes of contempt, both Judges were scratching around the bottom of the barrel, to find the case law allowing them to enforce a custodial sentence.
With nothing against Mr Paterson’s character and good standing, the Prosecution reverted to type and raised Mr Paterson’s previous offence of obstructing a police officer.
With a visible softening of the Judges, the packed gallery prayed for a suspended sentence, and muttering threats of revolution if it wasn’t given.
It was acknowledged by the Prosecution of the real concern of living in a world where it’s hard to enforce this law, with the technology of listening devices, getting smaller and smaller.
“This is a matter of importance for the public issue,” declared Mr Justice William Davis, climbing upon his moral high-ground, built upon the crimes of generations of his predecessors, “Now Mr Paterson, we have to decide what to do with you.”
Invited to give his response to the litany of lies, twisted-truths and allegations, leveled against his good character for the last 10 minutes, Mr Paterson was quick to explain what happened when the police assaulted him at Seaford.
To paraphrase;
“I was standing with my friend waiting to collect my car after it’s MOT. A police officer comes up to me and says he wants to search me because I’m being suspicious. He pushed me and assaulted my friend.”
During a passionate defense of himself on the day in question, Mr Paterson came coming across as a mild mannered gentlemen, unfairly treated by the state, convinced he is fighting a corrupt government and judiciary.
“That’s when my story began.”
One reporter was heard saying to another, “John is giving an impassioned speech before the judge.”
Talking about REDACTED CASE.
Now Mr Paterson is giving it to the Judges with both barrels, talking about Patrick Cullinane, “In a court of law there is no justice, because even if you are innocent you are found guilty.”
With mentions of Gordon Bowden and Brian Setchfield, referencing the criminal frauds of the Finchley Road Boiler Room, and the police crimes of Bohemia Police station in Hastings; Mr Justice William Davis was keen to rein Mr Paterson in.
“I do understand you have these concerns,” he said interrupting Mr Paterson’s tirade, to which Paterson replied in astonishment, “Concerns.”
Mutterings from the Public Gallery growing louder and louder.
“Is there anything you want to add, that makes what you did less serious,” asks Mr Justice William Davies.
“Well I would have loved to bring in more witnesses, but the last time I tried to bring in a witness, they stopped me.”
“I’ll glad I’m here to explain myself to the public,” declares Mr Paterson, before stating for the purposes of the Court’s tape
“David Joe Neilson is too scared to return to his home, because he fears he’ll be killed by Sussex police.”
“Institutions have been infiltrated by organised crime.”
To which Mr Lord Justice William Davies, replied in defiance, “That’s for another day,” before standing up and declaring a recess.
John Paterson is Smashing It
Back in Court 16 at 11.25, Mr Justice William Davies declared with puffed chest and venom on his voice, “we are here to sentence John Paterson for contempt of court.”
“It’s been proved.”
The Attorney General gave these aggravating and mitigating features;
Previously recorded at another case
Length of the recordings, over several hours
Not significant but a recording of a sensitive case
The nature of the proceedings that the recordings dealt with, could have aggregated matters
The response to previous convictions of obstructing a police officer
Mr Paterson has cooperated with the police operation fully
He promised not to do it again, and he hasn’t for the last 2 years, honouring his statement
Used the recording for his own personal needs, and hasn’t disseminated it further
Mr Paterson is 67, (corrected to 69 by Mr Paterson)
Mr Paterson is of good character
Length of time the case has taken to come to court
Mr Cullinane and Mr Scarf were given as case studies; on both occasions, the sentence was found to be excessive on appeal
Mr Justice William Davies reiterates, “Recording without permission is a serious matter, and the law must be fully complied with.” and then adds, “In appropriate circumstances, the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded. What is not permissible is allowing the public to take action into their own hands.”
This is a sentence which is the basis of why Mr Paterson finds himself facing imprisonment.
Let’s put it into perspective; Over 2 years earlier, Mr Paterson recorded the audio of a case, which was being recorded anyway, and made available to the public, and that in ‘appropriate circumstances’ the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded.
The Judge made it perfectly clear why Mr Paterson is in the dock.
“What is not permissible is allowing the public take actions In their hands.”
“The Sentence is to imprison you for 21 days, suspended for 12 months. Do you understand Mr Paterson. Keep out of trouble for 12 months and that will be the end of it.”
Paterson immediately asked permission to appeal, to which was instantly refused.
“It’s the discretion of the court,” screamed the Judge over the hissing from the public gallery.
Prolonging the agony, the Attorney General caught the Judges attention to hight-light two auxiliary matters.
“Forfeiture of the recording device and destruction of it.”
“I don’t think its lawful to destroy evidence in relation to my case,” replied Mr Paterson in response to the application of the destruction of recording device.
“Charlotte Wright from the BBC should be held in contempt too,” said Mr Paterson, complaining that she also recorded the same court case, but was allowed to do so, because she was from the BBC.
After a few moments of hushed whisper, the Judge’s decree that the micro SD card will be destroyed, but not the actual recording device.
“If you destroy that, you are destroying evidence,” decried Mr Paterson, to which the Judge reiterated, “I order the SD card destroyed.”
“Ordered SD card destroyed.” – ‘Too sensitive in nature to be released to the public.’
While the Judge’s crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s, Mr Paterson spent the free time, (and for the purposes of the tape) to again speak about the 788-790 Finchley Road boiler room fraud.
Costs claimed at £19,944.89
Wrapping up 11.45 am.
As the proceedings wrapped up and the public gallery emptied, the Fantastic Four (Frank, David, Bryn and Tony) flew the International Tribes flag for the first time in a British Court of law.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
JOIN THE UK MOAI KING WILLIAM IV PARTY TODAY - PLEASE LIKE, SUBSCRIBE AND SHARE, THANK YOU.
Further to my recommendation to Equity Lawyer, Edward William Ellis, to link 3 cases (4th case including the death of my sister Sadhana Chaudhari, from denying GcMAF),
These cases collectively deem the MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare Regulatory Authority) a Mass Global Terrorist Organisation and a Global Network of Big Pharma Assassins.
I have confirmed this in a phone call I made to the Case Referral Centre within MHRA Enforcement, see attached,
that the MHRA do not have any authority to prosecute Miracle Cancer Cure Manufacturer of GcMAF, David Noakes, whilst its Enforcement Department refused Criminal Liability for the Unlicensed use of Licensed Ranitidine (Trademark Zantac of Glaxo Smith Kline), the overdose of which caused the death of baby Sunaina. This drug continues to be used outside its licence restriction to this day, 19 years on without remedy. Hence all NHS deaths will be deemed as the Liability of MHRA unless otherwise proved.
The officer told me to make a complaint to the Coroner, CQC, the Professional bodies and the NHS Trust
I have issued a Criminal Prosecution Notice to MHRA for deaths of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari + her Mother Sadhana Chaudhari + the deaths of 200,000 lives in the UK and millions worldwide for its fraud of Mandating Licensing of an Un-licensable Naturally Occurring Product, GcMAF, an Immunotherapy, like a Vitamin. Naturally occurring products such as vitamins and minerals are not licensable. Licensing, Patenting are for synthetic drugs. This Licensing Mandate Fraud is an Assassination tool in the Monopoly to include only toxic synthetic Patents and exclude safe Immunotherapy, Homeopathy & Naturopathy
Neelu Chaudhari BPharm. Cert.Ed.
2019 05 03 Criminal Prosecution Notice to MHRA for deaths of Baby Sunaina Chaudhari + her Mother Sadhana Chaudhari by Pharmacist Neelu Chaudhari MHRA Edit
Baby Sunaina Case:
The prescribing of ranitidine in a 5 month old baby was outside of the licence of MHRA for use in children over 2 years old. All 4 doctors who prescribed it, 3 pharmacists who dispensed it and 20 nurses who administered it acted outside of the MHRA licensing and are therefore guilty of her Manslaughter. The MHRA has ultimate liability for not enforcing the safety of the unlicensed use of a licensed drug, Zantac, in babies under 2 years of age
The case of David Noakes demonstrates the MHRA prosecuting the manufacture, sale and supply of an effective treatment for cancer, which has a known potential to save over 100000 lives per year. The real determination for the court was whether GcMAF requires licensing in the first place, which it does not because it is a naturally occurring product.
The case of Holistic Naturopath Barbara Bradbury proved a conspiracy between an insurer, media, Professional body, Colleges and the courts to launder the amount of £800,000 without a court hearing to Discredit naturopathy and remove the subject from the University curriculum so as to maintain the Monopoly of Profit led synthetic pharmaceutical drugs regulated by the MHRA over Natural Remedies.
The death of Baby Sunaina’s mother, Sadhana Chaudhari, injected with MRSA Cancer in 2012 at UCL, after being referred by Whipps Cross Hospital Neurologist, Dr Ingle. The family were advised by Citizen Lee Cant to try GcMAF in June 2018, but were unable to obtain it due to the False Prosecution of David Noakes. The prosecuting Judge was Notified of this by me, Neelu, in November 2018 but he proceeded with a Sentencing and Conviction, sitting alone, whilst David Noakes had Withdrawn the Fraud Guilty Plea to his lawyers.
Edward Ellis will be going live with Andy Devine on Sundays 4-6pm UK time on Mass Remedy Process
Mr.X Investigations 