REPORTING WITNESS INTIMIDATION

PLACE: Comments posted on my Youtube Channel www.youtube.com/channel/UCmP8UJgEIDZYWG6jE4GGhzg

DATE: Between 23 September – Present Day

TIME: All times of the day

INVOLVING: Ricky Dearman and Karen Irving

RICKY DEARMAN

A person who I reasonably believe to be Ricky Dearman, (who I made a complaint of receiving malicious communications, harassment and stalking to Sussex police on 21 June 2019), is sending me intimidating comments, in contravention of Section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, under the sock puppet account ‘tniedermeier’.

The relentless, unwanted, abusive and malicious comments I’ve received from a person I reasonably believe to be Ricky Dearman, has caused me immense personal alarm, fear and distress.

This is particularly scary because Ricky Dearman is the father in the horrific Hampstead satanic case, who has been accused by his own children of being a satanic cult leader who cuts of babies heads and eats them; not forgetting the allegations of child rape, torture and drug use.

As a father myself, I live in constant fear, distress and alarm that Dearman will target my children.

There is an on-going Sussex police investigation, and the comments I’ve received from both Ricky Dearman and Karen Irving amount to Witness Intimidation, in contravention of Section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

I reasonably believe the ‘sock puppet’ account of ‘tniedermeier’ is  Ricky Dearman because I speaks to me in the first person; as examples below show:

Below is the most recent malicious and intimidation comment received via Youtube at 04:08am on 12 November 2019, in response to a video publicizing the detention of John Paterson.

The relentless, unwanted, abusive and malicious comments I’ve received from a person I reasonably believe to be Ricky Dearman, has caused me immense personal alarm, fear and distress.

There is an on-going Sussex police investigation, and the comments I’ve received from both Ricky Dearman and Karen Irving amount to Witness Intimidation, in contravention of Section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

KAREN IRVING

Karen Irving has made similar intimidating comments about me on her blog, www.hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com

During a Live Youtube broadcast on  31 October 2019, titled “Still out there,’ www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UnLYuFTGf0 , on Karen Irving’s Hoaxtead Research Youtube channel www.youtube.com/channel/UCZRdasyGbdv49zIROC8s9BA and in response to a comment from ‘tniedermeier,’ Karen Irving said the following between 4 mins 32 sec – 5 mind 20 sec.

“And so Matt Taylor obviously is now of the opinion that he can do and say whatever he likes because no one’s actually watching him. Not true Matt. Better keep an eye on that and keep in mind that the last time he was in court for stalking someone, he was brought up short on, he basically was given a suspended sentence and told that he would have to be of good behavior and not do anything similar for the next two years. 

So frankly if I were him, I would be keeping my mouth shut. It’s just my thought, you know because I forget who it was that said, “if you are in a hole you should stop digging. Well maybe he should, maybe Angela should, maybe a lot of people should, but they don’t, so there you go. Anyhow yes so yeah I think a lot of people are in deep trouble.”

I believe this contravenes the Section 51(1) of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, because she threatens me to ‘keep my mouth shut.’

This is clearly intimidation and interference in an on-going police investigation.

Irving states that a court ordered me “to be of good behaviour and not to do anything similar for the next two years.”

I believe the court case she was referring to was on 15 October 2018, where I was found guilty in my absence, of ‘Contempt.’

At no time have I received any court instructions that I must, “to be of good behaviour and not to do anything similar for the next two years.”

I am only aware that I mustn’t publicly mention a name of a particular person, who I’m forbidden from naming in public.

Further examples of malicious communications, which do not violate the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, but which amount to malicious communication, are as follows:

I wish this to be my formal criminal complaint against Ricky Dearman and Karen Irving.

I’ve discussed this with DC Duncan Lloyd from Sussex Police, who advised me to make this complaint.

I believe the above statement is a true and accurate representation of the continuing harassment, stalking, malicious communication and witness intimidation, which I receive on a daily basis.

Matthew Taylor

FOR THE ATTENTION OF SUSSEX POLICE

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cvAMmaAOv6eP/