SUBSCRIBE TO TAYLOR TV
788-790 – Where did all our pensions go?
Inspired by Joseph Magi and Simone Speaks, I’m dabbling with black magic, to guide me through this fight with evil satanic black magic, I now find myself engaged.
Having watched Joseph and Simone read the tarots, I know you can ask any questions, and receive answers from the other side, to any subject matters.
I’m looking forward to analyse the day’s news and ask searching questions about the world around us and what we need to do to save our future from the New World Order.
To start my very first tarot reading, LIVE ON FACEBOOK, there was really only one subject on my mind. JOHN WANOA.
What’s happening with John Wanoa?
- Card 1 – Eight of pentacles – What’s at hand
- Card 2 – Six of cups – Past Influences
- Card 3 – Seven of cups – Ponder this
- Card 4 – The Chariot – What to do
- Extra – Nine of swords – For John’s enemies and detractors
Using a simple 4 card spread setting out what’s at hand, past influencers, what to ponder and what to do; the first card out was the Eight of Pentacles.
I used a 5th card to tell me the fate of John’s enemies and detractors.
Eight of Pentacles
When you dedicate yourself to producing quality work, you will gain greater freedom all the way around.
The Eight of Pentacles is the card of works. We see here the successful artisan spending time at his bench, hammering out the commissions he has attracted because of his skill. This artist is the best in her or his class, so popular that it’s become difficult keep up with demand. She is paid whatever she asks and accepts only the most worthy assignments.
If there is a problem in this card, it has to do with the trap of workaholism, the feeling of being so indispensable that you will not ask for help or delegate anything. There is also the issue of becoming so identified as the creator of elegant works, that the personal identity of the creator becomes consumed by the works themselves. This artisan seldom gets to have a home life, time off, much time for friends. The solution lies in balancing creative energy with a personal life.
Six of Cups
Look at your past as a repository of wisdom to be applied judiciously in the present.
The Six of Cups generally represents a refreshing openness and innocence, a willingness to learn and an optimism that things will get better as we advance together in understanding. The traditional title, The Past, reminds us of our original nature, when we were young and enthusiastic, when anything was possible and the future was an open book. We are to remember that this same freshness, those new possibilities, are always available to us, even now.
Seven of Cups
Allow yourself to daydream, for dreams give you creative ideas and solutions and produce wonderful results.
The Seven of Cups typically refers to works of the imagination, the use of dream and vision to invent a future different than the life one is currently living. This card reminds us that our outcomes are not set in stone.
We can raise our hopes and expectations and upgrade our results. Do not be fooled by the title Fantasy which this card is sometimes given — this card indicates the truly magical quality of awakened imagination.
AN INTERRUPTION TO PROCEEDINGS
It was at this point during the reading that the card/spirit of Pamela Colman Smith made an appearance. Responsible for creating the original Rider Waite Tarot deck, she assured me that she was guiding the reading and was at my disposal for advice and guidance whenever I needed it.
As were all my Guardian Angels, watching over the tarot reading that night.
Look upon the movements of change as full of promise and adventure.
The Chariot Tarot card points to a triumphal feeling of freedom, as if the Charioteer is being paraded through the streets as a hero (or heroine). The card reflects congratulations for high achievement, and serves as a sign of empowerment.
Huge wheels and frisky steeds speed the rate at which the driver’s will power can be realized. This kind of charge makes more of the world accessible to one ambitious enough to seize The Chariot’s reins. But there is danger in this feeling of freedom, because of the increased rate of change and its power to magnify mistakes in judgment. As a seasoned warrior, the Charioteer is called upon to be extra attentive to the way ahead.
Nine of Swords
Honestly admit to yourself that you have sacrificed time and energy on a situation that simply does not work.
The Nine of Swords has a special resonance with the Middle Ages, because it figures the plight of a woman who is alone in the world, during the centuries when women had no personal rights, no ability to inherit property or use the law in their own defense. We generally see her sitting up in bed weeping, grieving and in fear of abandonment because of her vulnerability, wondering what will happen to her now that her protector (father, brother, husband, or son) is gone.
The swords above her head may indicate that the loss has come through some cruel conflict, the outcome of which has left her behind as chattel, the spoils of war. Really what we are looking at is the price of pride, which creates losers as a side effect of glorifying winners. The woman in the picture represents the concerns of the heart, the damage to the soul and to vulnerable ones, when the ego-mind becomes so invested in control and domination that it does not count the human costs. A sensitive, subtle, heartfelt approach to nature (the “feminine”) is trampled and thrown aside in service to a “winner takes all” mentality.
GUERRILLA DEMOCRACY NEWS SPECIAL REPORT
Fraud investigator, Royal Commission Protected Witness and an all-round Peaceful Warrior, 69 year old Sir John Paterson, was sentenced to 21 days in prison, suspended for 12 months, for being in contempt of court.
A packed public gallery heard how in April 2017, John Paterson secretly recorded a court case at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, on a small voice recorder.
Even though all court cases are recorded and available to the public, and whilst in some circumstances permission can be given to record court proceedings, Mr Paterson was subjected to 2 years of state sponsored torture, threatened with jail, and fines, for recording a public event, for his own educational and personal reasons.
In-side Court 16 of the Royal Courts of InJustice
Once Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis kicked off the proceedings, (with the latter doing all the talking), Citizen John Paterson addressed the court, stating he has Crown Protection and for his witness Equity Lawyer, Edward Ellis, to explain further.
Upon being refused Mr Paterson said, “It is my right to do so,” after which Edward Ellis said to the Judges, “You have no jurisdiction,” to which Mr Justice William Davis replied, “Having heard what I’ve just heard, Mr Ellis, go and sit in the public gallery.”
Judgement of Court
Having endured the stress and strain of having imprisonment, fine or both, hanging over his head for the last two years, a packed public gallery heard the Application by the Attorney General for the imprisonment of Mr Paterson for contempt of court.
With the verdict hanging in the balance, whispered chat throughout Court 16 was of a suspended sentence.
Mentioned in the harassment case of Christoper D Spivey in 2015 (against the family of the murdered soldier Lee Rigby,) and now again in Mr Paterson’s contempt case, Mr.X was referred to by name; all further information is REDACTED.
It was explained by the Prosecution that at the time of the recording, it wasn’t noticed, but came to light later when audio of the REDACTED CASE was uploaded to Youtube.
Having hid the recording device in the base of a house plant, police initially missed it when they raided his property in relation to the REACTED CASE, on the 8th May 2017.
Mr Paterson voluntarily surrendered the listening device which was found to have 5 recordings of the REDACTED CASE.
With good support in the public gallery, loyal friend and supporter Neelu Berry entered court late; having had herself a busy night, sparing with the forces of Satan knocking at her door at a quarter to eleven, protecting ‘Cure for Cancer’ whistle-blower, Lynda Thyer.
State Sponsored Assassination Attempt
Looking relaxed, at peace and calm, Mr Paterson lent back against the Queen’s bench, as the Prosecution and Judges waffled on for 15 minutes, talking legalese between themselves.
Slowly and surely a consensus was agreed;
- No one was aware of the recording
- Mr Paterson had offered it for transcribing, all offers were declined
- The recording was made for his own personal use
Citing more evidence against him, via his emails, proving his contempt, the Judge asked in no uncertain terms, “What excuse do you have for recording a public event?”
“I had to because I’m exposing the corrupt judiciary. I do not accept it’s a contempt of court,” Mr Paterson answered.
Going further, Mr Paterson said “The PM and Attorney General have provided protection frauds for organised crime.”
No witnesses from the Prosecution
Standing before the Judges alone and without any legal representation, the Prosecution called no witnesses, while Mr Paterson was allowed to cross examine DC Grimwood.
Mr Grimwood takes the stand
With the Prosecution asking DC Grimwood to open a number of bundles of paper, and to confirm that the Statement of 19 June 2017, was a true and accurate account of the events, and whether another statement on 24 May 2019, was also his own, the Prosecution wrapped it up and it was Mr Paterson’s turn to cross examine him.
Mr Paterson started by asking him to confirm whether he had received information about serious crimes of State and Judiciary?
Looking for guidance from Mr Justice William Davis to continue, DC Grimwood confirmed that he had.
Pressed by the Judge as to whether there were anymore questions, Mr Paterson asked why he hadn’t done anything about the serious crimes he had already reported?
“I’m guilty of trying to save my country.”
- Mr Justice William Davis – “Do you accept that you did record the proceedings?”
- Sir John Paterson – “Yes I did, I had to do it.”
- Mr Justice William Davis – “Do you accept its contempt of court?”
- Sir John Paterson – “No. I’ve had to do it, to bring the fraud to the attention of the public.”
Confirming to the court that Mr Paterson had reported serious crimes of government and judiciary to himself, and confirming that he is in possession of all the evidence Mr Paterson possessed, DC Grimwood was allowed to leave the witness stand.
- 10.37am The Fantastic Four arrive, and pile into the public gallery
- Frank McElheron, David Ellis, Bryn Real and Tony Livingstone.
The Judges rose to reassess the situation at 10.50am
Mr Justice William Davis offers Mr Paterson a choice of taking the witness stand or to remain seated. Either to give evidence or make submissions.
(It’s all legalese to me.)
As the mis-trial continued unabated, Mr Paterson was denied legal representation, and was left with no alternative but to defend himself against the Attorney General, (who was costing the taxpayer £19K a day)
A Mistrial and an Injustice of Justice
Mr Paterson read out the introduction of a prepared statement by Edward Ellis, declaring he wanted the Equity Lawyer to explain further, but is unable to.
“This conduct does amount to contempt of court,” sneered the Prosecution.
With gasps from the public gallery, the Judges concluded that Mr Paterson has been proved to be in contempt, and that the respondent knew he wasn’t allowed to record but went ahead and did so anyway.
The Judge summed up in disjointed language, “Your defense of corruption has nothing to point.”
The Judges have now moved onto working out how long to sentence him.
“This is a set up, poor guy,” said a member from the public gallery.
The facts established are as follows:
- He voluntarily submitted the listening device to police
- He hasn’t undertaken any recording since
- He’s never published anything online about the REDACTED proceedings
“Here’s hoping for a suspended sentence,” said one member in the public gallery to the other, “the Judges appear to be considerate that John has been a good boy.”
Mr Paterson’s previous Common Law lawyer and friend, Patrick Cullinane is mentioned. Mr Paterson’s voiced his fear that what happened to Patrick will happen to him.
“I don’t think he’s going down, but will be given a suspended sentence. I really hope so,” said one reporter to the other.
Whispering between themselves like sly bullies at school, conspiring to cause harm, loss and injury to the unfortunate souls they’ve chosen to pick on, both Lord Justice Males and Mr Justice William Davis moved onto discussing case studies, to determine how much time they can legally sentence him to.
Citing Mr Scarf, a 78-year-old pensioner, who received 28 days suspended for 2 years, for continually committing contempt of court, and Mr Cullinane, (Mr Paterson’s Common Law Lawyer) for his alleged crimes of contempt, both Judges were scratching around the bottom of the barrel, to find the case law allowing them to enforce a custodial sentence.
With nothing against Mr Paterson’s character and good standing, the Prosecution reverted to type and raised Mr Paterson’s previous offence of obstructing a police officer.
With a visible softening of the Judges, the packed gallery prayed for a suspended sentence, and muttering threats of revolution if it wasn’t given.
It was acknowledged by the Prosecution of the real concern of living in a world where it’s hard to enforce this law, with the technology of listening devices, getting smaller and smaller.
“This is a matter of importance for the public issue,” declared Mr Justice William Davis, climbing upon his moral high-ground, built upon the crimes of generations of his predecessors, “Now Mr Paterson, we have to decide what to do with you.”
Invited to give his response to the litany of lies, twisted-truths and allegations, leveled against his good character for the last 10 minutes, Mr Paterson was quick to explain what happened when the police assaulted him at Seaford.
“I was standing with my friend waiting to collect my car after it’s MOT. A police officer comes up to me and says he wants to search me because I’m being suspicious. He pushed me and assaulted my friend.”
During a passionate defense of himself on the day in question, Mr Paterson came coming across as a mild mannered gentlemen, unfairly treated by the state, convinced he is fighting a corrupt government and judiciary.
“That’s when my story began.”
One reporter was heard saying to another, “John is giving an impassioned speech before the judge.”
Talking about REDACTED CASE.
Now Mr Paterson is giving it to the Judges with both barrels, talking about Patrick Cullinane, “In a court of law there is no justice, because even if you are innocent you are found guilty.”
With mentions of Gordon Bowden and Brian Setchfield, referencing the criminal frauds of the Finchley Road Boiler Room, and the police crimes of Bohemia Police station in Hastings; Mr Justice William Davis was keen to rein Mr Paterson in.
“I do understand you have these concerns,” he said interrupting Mr Paterson’s tirade, to which Paterson replied in astonishment, “Concerns.”
Mutterings from the Public Gallery growing louder and louder.
“Is there anything you want to add, that makes what you did less serious,” asks Mr Justice William Davies.
“Well I would have loved to bring in more witnesses, but the last time I tried to bring in a witness, they stopped me.”
“I’ll glad I’m here to explain myself to the public,” declares Mr Paterson, before stating for the purposes of the Court’s tape
- “David Joe Neilson is too scared to return to his home, because he fears he’ll be killed by Sussex police.”
- “Institutions have been infiltrated by organised crime.”
To which Mr Lord Justice William Davies, replied in defiance, “That’s for another day,” before standing up and declaring a recess.
John Paterson is Smashing It
Back in Court 16 at 11.25, Mr Justice William Davies declared with puffed chest and venom on his voice, “we are here to sentence John Paterson for contempt of court.”
“It’s been proved.”
The Attorney General gave these aggravating and mitigating features;
- Previously recorded at another case
- Length of the recordings, over several hours
- Not significant but a recording of a sensitive case
- The nature of the proceedings that the recordings dealt with, could have aggregated matters
- The response to previous convictions of obstructing a police officer
- Mr Paterson has cooperated with the police operation fully
- He promised not to do it again, and he hasn’t for the last 2 years, honouring his statement
- Used the recording for his own personal needs, and hasn’t disseminated it further
- Mr Paterson is 67, (corrected to 69 by Mr Paterson)
- Mr Paterson is of good character
- Length of time the case has taken to come to court
- Mr Cullinane and Mr Scarf were given as case studies; on both occasions, the sentence was found to be excessive on appeal
Mr Justice William Davies reiterates, “Recording without permission is a serious matter, and the law must be fully complied with.” and then adds, “In appropriate circumstances, the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded. What is not permissible is allowing the public to take action into their own hands.”
This is a sentence which is the basis of why Mr Paterson finds himself facing imprisonment.
Let’s put it into perspective; Over 2 years earlier, Mr Paterson recorded the audio of a case, which was being recorded anyway, and made available to the public, and that in ‘appropriate circumstances’ the proceedings can be allowed to be recorded.
The Judge made it perfectly clear why Mr Paterson is in the dock.
“What is not permissible is allowing the public take actions In their hands.”
“The Sentence is to imprison you for 21 days, suspended for 12 months. Do you understand Mr Paterson. Keep out of trouble for 12 months and that will be the end of it.”
Paterson immediately asked permission to appeal, to which was instantly refused.
“It’s the discretion of the court,” screamed the Judge over the hissing from the public gallery.
Prolonging the agony, the Attorney General caught the Judges attention to hight-light two auxiliary matters.
“Forfeiture of the recording device and destruction of it.”
“I don’t think its lawful to destroy evidence in relation to my case,” replied Mr Paterson in response to the application of the destruction of recording device.
“Charlotte Wright from the BBC should be held in contempt too,” said Mr Paterson, complaining that she also recorded the same court case, but was allowed to do so, because she was from the BBC.
After a few moments of hushed whisper, the Judge’s decree that the micro SD card will be destroyed, but not the actual recording device.
“If you destroy that, you are destroying evidence,” decried Mr Paterson, to which the Judge reiterated, “I order the SD card destroyed.”
“Ordered SD card destroyed.” – ‘Too sensitive in nature to be released to the public.’
While the Judge’s crossed the t’s and dotted the i’s, Mr Paterson spent the free time, (and for the purposes of the tape) to again speak about the 788-790 Finchley Road boiler room fraud.
Costs claimed at £19,944.89
Wrapping up 11.45 am.
As the proceedings wrapped up and the public gallery emptied, the Fantastic Four (Frank, David, Bryn and Tony) flew the International Tribes flag for the first time in a British Court of law.
Master stalker and insidious troll, Matt Taylor’s reign of terror has come to an end.
Taylor’s first ever Youtube Video
Youtube has suspended his channel which had nearly 1500 subscribers.
A convicted stalker, suspected peadophile and a financial fraudster, Matt Taylor’s online existence has now been permanently erased.
Matt Taylor never Existed
Taylor burst onto the Truth Movement in 2014, when he clashed with Ian R Crane and Brian Gerrish at AV5, at a Truth Conference at which he uncovered a cover-up.
Since then he has attracted over a million readers to his Guerrilla Democracy News blog, becoming a regular topic of interest in the HOAXTEAD Research community and an arch critic of conspiracy writer Chris Spivey.
Claiming to have unmasked a satanic super soldier, Taylor is said to have been shutdown by MI6, following calls from ChristChurch shooting survivors including Elliot Marshall Dawson.
Keen to distract from a diplomatic incident with the New Zealand government, the shut down and erasing of Matt Taylor’s existence for the Internet, may actually hinder a current and in-going investigation into Historical Child sexual abuse called Operation Hydrant, by removing certain videos relating to the historical child sexual abuse, which answers the questions asked by the PSD Department of Sussex Police in their investigation.
Home Secretary Sajid Javid has been made aware of the situation and is set to call a Cobra meeting after the Easter Holiday break.
Matt Taylor no longer exists.