Congratulations to Sussex police for catching a prolific paedophile, but shame on the judicial system for letting him remain free in the community.
The article, ’Hove Grindr pervert Michael Dawson wanted sex with boys,’ highlights the awkward question of what to do with paedophiles.
I recently watched a man on Youtube proudly declare the only good paedophile, is a dead paedophile!
Or is a good paedophile personified in the guise of Michael Dawson, who claims, (via his lawyer), he only spent 20 years as a Scout leader, as a “genuine desire to help the development of young boys,” rather than anything sexual.
Lawyer Kevin Light defending Dawson said, “My client refutes the suggestion of any sexual motivation, but rather a genuine desire to help the development of young boys.”
He added there have been no allegations made during his 20-year involvement with the Scouts.
Showing ‘no understanding’ of why his behaviour was wrong, Judge Shani Barnes spared Dawson an immediate prison sentence and instead told him to complete 40 hours of unpaid work and sessions with a sex offenders’ programme.
In a Sussex police sting, (along the lines of the ever-popular paedophile hunter rings, now springing up across the UK), Dawson was lead to believe he was meeting a 13-year-old boy for some kind of sexual contact.
When told the teenager’s age, Dawson replied, “I don’t mind if you don’t.”
Written by Aidan Barlow, the Crime Reporter for The Argus in Brighton:
A PERVERT cut holes in his vest to expose his nipples before going to meet a 13-year-old boy for sex.
Michael Dawson had contacted the boy, who he believed was a teenager, on the Grindr mobile phone dating app in Hove.
But the 54-year-old former Scout leader was in fact on his way to meet an undercover police officer who had set up a decoy account.
When asked if being 13 was a problem, Dawson replied: “I don’t mind if you don’t.”
Dawson tried to set up a meeting in George Street in Hove, but was arrested.
Then, while on bail for the first offence, he was back on Grindr approaching another police decoy account, this time for a 15-year-old boy.
Dawson claimed he only intended to go for a “drink” despite sending sexual suggestions to both and claimed he was “flattered” someone young would be attracted to him.
At Hove Crown Court Dawson admitted arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence and attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child.
A report by the probation service suggested the former Gatwick Airport security worker showed “no understanding” of why his behaviour was wrong.
But he was spared an immediate prison sentence and was instead told to complete unpaid work and sessions with a sex offenders’ programme.
Stuart Ellacott, prosecuting, said Dawson committed the first offences in February.
Dawson told the boy – in fact a police officer – that he would wear a vest with holes in it exposing his nipples.
He wanted to take the boy back to his home where “some form of sexual contact would have taken place”.
Kevin Light, defending, said Dawson had worked at Gatwick for more than 25 years as a security guard and had also been an assistant firefighter.
Dawson was also a Scout leader for 20 years but said his motivation was not sexual and said there have been no allegations made.
“My client refutes the suggestion and says he had a genuine desire to help the development of young boys,” Mr Light said.
The advocate said Dawson, of Wilbury Avenue, Hove, needed “help” from the sex offenders’ programme.
Judge Shani Barnes said: “You attempted to meet young boys for sexual encounters.”
The judge imposed a 20-month suspended prison sentence and told Dawson to complete sessions with the Horizon sex offenders’ programme and 40 hours of unpaid work.
She imposed a ten-year sexual harm prevention order restricting Dawson’s access to under 18s and put Dawson on the sex offenders register.
Someone has left a very interesting comment on a Guerrilla Democracy News article, that I thought worth sharing…
“Anyone attacking the author of this page (thank you so much for this article) and those who choose to defend these many sick, depraved people are no better than the people that hurt these children for their pleasures. Photographic evidence and victim testimonies WILL surface in the near future. Russel is most probably the product of a satanic/ritual abuse family line and will continue to harm children – as has been done to him. Russel needs to be hospitilized and jailed. If you would like to learn more about how these horrors exist, practically in plain sight – please watch the documentary: Out of Shadows and The Fall of the Cabal.”
READ THE ARTICLE – RUSSELL BRAND EXPOSED AS A PAEDOPHILE….
Threatening the future of the British Monarchy, a former Royal Palace Police officer has revealed the true character behind the public facade of playboy, Prince Andrew of the Windsor royal family.
Ex Royal Cop Paul Page has given a game changing interview with Shaun Attwood, blowing apart the word of Prince Andrew’s testimony given to Emily Maitlis, during a Newsnight interview aired on 16 November 2019.
Approaching 400,000 youtube subscribers, Shaun Attwood is a leading presenter in the Truth Movement, broadcasting daily updates on the Prince Andrew/Jeffery Epstein paedophile scandal, which threatens to bring down the British royal family.
Reassuring the viewers that he is talking from first hand experience, Paul Page explained how the set protocol of the Palace required all royal members to inform the police officers guarding the public entrance of the Palace, to send down all their appointment each day by 9am.
In Page’s own words;
“Now what happens is first thing the morning there’s another security post inside the palace at the front with police officers in it, and they get all the appointments for all the members of the royal family sent down to him, and they write it in their book. So in the morning at nine o’clock they ring those appointments to the officers on the gate, they write in their book so they know exactly who’s coming in at what time, and who they’re going to see.”
According to Page, the only member of the royal family who failed to follow procedure was Prince Andrew and Prince Andrew alone.
“There’s a set procedure, you can’t just walk into the palace, there can’t be any mistakes made and all the members of the royal family understand that they have to provide the names of the visitors. The only one who doesn’t, who never did, was Prince Andrew. So that protocol was not followed by him and him alone.”
Contradicting the image he presents to the public, Prince Andrew seems to be lurching from one scandal to another. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.
“We complained about this on a number of occasions and we’re told it is what it is, you know, it’s his ass and if he wants to do that and he can do that.”
Rising above the fear of losing their jobs and pensions, ex-royal cop Paul Page, is just one of many whistle-blowers, coming forward over the last few years, lifting the veil of secrecy which has draped the Windsor royal family, since Queen Victoria sat on the Throne.
“I’m saying there is 100% what I saw and what I heard nothing more nothing less.”
Accused of failing to assist the FBI with the Jeffery Epstein human trafficking investigation, Prince Andrew cannot rely on the drama of his nephew leaving the UK to set up base in Canada, to divert attention from his own paedophile scandal.
Paul Page continues;
“On this particular occasion, a young female approaches us and says she’s she’s here to visit Prince Andrew. Well we didn’t have anything in the book, we don’t put anything in the book because it’s Prince Andrew.”
Upon denying the young female entry;
“She said, ah well I’ll tell you what I’ll ring him on it on his mobile, so she proceeded to ring Prince Andrew who was in his room. His apartments face the front of the palace so he clearly could look down and see us and so she just said to him, “Andrew it’s me, the officers won’t let me in because I’m not expected apparently”, so we can hear him on the phone, he said, “put one of the officers on the phone”, so my colleague picked the phone up and he basically said to him,”listen to me you fat lardy ass cunt, let my guests in now or I’ll come down there immediately.”
Contrary to the image he wanted to portray himself during the infamous Newsnight interview with BBC journalist Emily Maitlis, in which he vainly called himself “honourable,” nothing could be further from the truth, according to the first hand testimony of Paul Page, who knows the true character of the lying Prince.
To remind you what he said to Emily Maitlis, in response to being asked why he spent time with a convicted sex offender;
There is nothing “honourable,” about publicly bullying a royal palace police officer, whose only priority is to keep him and his extended family safe, from a nation of disgruntled peasants, intent on storming the palace gates and beheading the Monarch…
And that wasn’t the only time Paul Page was confronted with the real character of the paedophile friendly Prince;
“I mean another occasion we were we were in the police Lodge and we get a call that there’s a unidentified person on the Queen’s corridor, albeit that the Queen was not in residence at this time, but the security cameras couldn’t work out who it was wandering up and down. Obviously they sent myself and two PC’s and a sergeant to go and investigate, and ascertain who it was. So two of us went one way round the corridor and the others went the other way in order to come either end of him, and as we got closer it was Prince Andrew, just dressed scruffily, and the sergeant approached him and said, “I’m really sorry your highness, we got called because no one could recognize who it was on camera, and we were just coming to make sure that it wasn’t an intruder,” and he said, “listen to me, this is my house and I’ll go where I want now fuck off.”
“He is just a rude abusive obnoxious person.”
In a news report that appeared on the BBC News website, ‘Prince Andrew ‘grateful’ for Buckingham Palace police apology’, published on 8 September 2013, we hear the Princes’s side of the story;
The Duke of York has said he is “grateful” for an apology from police after officers challenged him in the gardens of Buckingham Palace.
In a statement, Prince Andrew said the police had a difficult job and sometimes they “get it wrong”.
Scotland Yard confirmed it had stopped the prince and said the force had “apologised for any inconvenience”.
The incident happened two days after a man was arrested on suspicion of burglary inside the palace.
The duke said: “The police have a difficult job to do balancing security for the Royal Family and deterring intruders, and sometimes they get it wrong.
“I am grateful for their apology and look forward to a safe walk in the garden in the future.”
Read more: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24005811
Exposing Prince Andrew as a serial liar, Paul Page goes onto call into question, Prince Andrew’s claim made during the BBC Newsnight Maitlis interview, that he’d only go out in London wearing a suit and tie.
Shaun Attwood made the statement,“In the BBC interview Andrew said he never goes out in casual clothes in London,” to which Page replied;
“That is wrong. I said this previously, he’s talking rubbish. He used to sometimes come back in a shirt and chinos, a shirt without a tie, like a golfing, like a Pringle type jumper on. He would come back casually dressed on quite a few occasions. He would only go out dressed in a shirt and tie, if it’s sort of an official engagement, but a lot of the times I’d see him in a polo t-shirt and what-have-you. So I don’t know why he even went down that road.”
In Prince Andrew’s Defense…
When asked if Prince Andrew was seen with any under aged girls, Paul Page definitively replied;
“They were in their twenties, and there wasn’t any that I would say were younger than that. They were definitely in their twenties, and definitely some of them are 15-20 years younger than Prince Andrew. it’s obviously, and not just my opinion, it’s the opinion of other officers that I work with, that he had a taste for younger women and you know that’s fine, but there was never an occasion, and I can honestly say that, that I ever had suspicions about the age of a female guest entering the palace.”
To finish off, lets remind ourselves of the other statements Prince Andrew made during that fateful Newsnight interview.